Indigenous Relations

Rights and title first. Partnership grounded in UNDRIP, built to hold for the life of a project.

What We Do

We advise proponents and Indigenous governments on partnership, consultation, and consent, grounded in UNDRIP, the recognition of Aboriginal rights and title, and the federal and provincial Declaration Acts that now shape how projects are assessed and approved in Canada.

Rights and Title

We start from rights and title as legal and constitutional fact, not as a stakeholder interest to be managed.

Consent by Design

Free, prior, and informed consent treated as something you build toward from the beginning, not test for at the end.

We support Nations and proponents in building structured partnerships grounded in rights and title, UNDRIP principles, and long-term alignment.

Key Support Areas

Every Nation is different — its governance, its treaty or title position, its priorities, its history with industry. There is no template. We help clients understand the specific relationship in front of them, and build engagement that respects it and lasts.

Title & Treaty

Assessment of rights, title, and treaty context, and what each means for a project’s design and pathway.

Consultation Record

Consultation records, engagement logs, and management plans that satisfy regulators and hold up on review.

Human Environment

Socio-economic baselines, human health, and cumulative effects work prepared to the standard assessment authorities expect.

Our Approach

We support clients through consultation, negotiation, mediation, and agreement-making — impact benefit and participation agreements, traditional land use planning, and the long relationships behind them. Our technical work integrates western science with Indigenous knowledge, using GBA+, cumulative effects, and regional assessment.

Indigenous inclusion is not a risk-management exercise. UNDRIP, rights, and title are now the ground on which Canadian projects are built.

What Clients Say

“Client or partner testimonial specific to the project’s success and Falkirk’s approach.”

Name Surname

Position, Company Name

“ClearPath didn’t just navigate the approval process—they anticipated every objection and turned it into an opportunity. Our project moved forward on schedule because they thought three steps ahead.”

Testimonial 5

“ClearPath didn’t just navigate the approval process—they anticipated every objection and turned it into an opportunity. Our project moved forward on schedule because they thought three steps ahead.”

Testimonial 3

Operations Manager, BC Hydro

“ClearPath didn’t just navigate the approval process—they anticipated every objection and turned it into an opportunity. Our project moved forward on schedule because they thought three steps ahead.”

Testimonial 2

VP Operations, Coal Company ltd.

“ClearPath didn’t just navigate the approval process—they anticipated every objection and turned it into an opportunity. Our project moved forward on schedule because they thought three steps ahead.”

Testimonial 1

President, BCMEA

ClearPath didn’t just navigate the approval process—they anticipated every objection and turned it into an opportunity. Our project moved forward on schedule because they thought three steps ahead.

Sarah Chen

VP Development, Major Energy

Start the Conversation Early

The earlier we are involved, the more options you have.